Discovery on Steroids
December 9, 2016 § 5 Comments
I know things can get tense out there, friends, but I hope it doesn’t come to this here in Mississippi:
A San Diego lawyer disbarred in a default judgment after walking out of his disciplinary trial says he plans to sue state officials involved in the proceedings.
The former lawyer, Douglas James Crawford, was accused of bringing pepper spray and a stun gun to a deposition, threatening to use them on opposing counsel if things got out of hand, and discharging the stun gun while pointing it toward opposing counsel, according to a summary of his case in the California Bar Journal. He was disbarred in September.
Crawford tells the San Diego Union-Tribune that he plans to sue for civil rights violations. He says he walked out of the disciplinary trial because he believed lawyers for the State Bar of California misrepresented facts and improperly kept him from presenting witnesses and evidence.
“As far as the disbarment, I could care less,” Crawford told the Union-Tribune. “It’s not really a group of people I want to associate myself with.”
A state bar court had found Crawford culpable in four of eight misconduct charges against him, according to the California Bar Journal summary and a July 2015 decision by the bar court hearing department. The bar court found he engaged in moral turpitude in the pepper spray and stun gun incident.
Crawford told the Union-Tribune that he brought the stun gun and pepper spray to the deposition because someone had brought a gun to another deposition and he felt unsafe. He said he displayed the stun gun and pepper spray to disclose that he was armed, but he never threatened anyone with them.
People bringing guns to depositions? People feeling unsafe at depositions? My Lord. And the disbarred lawyer is planning to sue for “civil rights violations.” Really.
I didn’t make this up. You can read the article at this link.
The Better Chancery Practice Blog 
Last year, during a deposition in a law office in Clarksdale, a lawyer who was plaintiff to the lawsuit was deposing the opposite party when the opponent drew a handgun and murdered the lawyer, Ellis Pittman. The mayor of Clarksdale witnessed events preceding the murder; the mayor is the lawyer who represented the defendant, Mr. Frazier.
But guns are supposed to be everywhere – churches, courthouses – to make us safer. Or so I keep hearing.
The worst violation appears to be grammatical in his improper use of the phrase “I could care less,” for surely he meant “I couldn’t care less.”
Many people would agree with your grammatical point. I think the other way, and the article at this link sums up my thinking: http://www.slate.com/blogs/lexicon_valley/2014/03/18/why_i_could_care_less_is_not_as_irrational_or_ungrammatical_as_you_might.html
Tongue in cheek aside, I really think his worst violation is being admitted to the bar in the first place.
Sounds like Mr. Crawford was on something more than steroids (or should have been).