July 4, 2014 § 1 Comment

Independence Day.

State Holiday. Courthouse closed.

§ One Response to

  • reidkrell says:

    Judge Primeaux,

    The interesting thing about this case for me was Judge James’ dissent arguing that the foreclosure sale was ineffective. I found the Court’s dismissal of that issue as improperly preserved unimpressive, and I think that for those who act as substitute trustees, Judge James’ dissent lays out some important thoughts on how to protect your foreclosures from later collateral attack.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading at The Better Chancery Practice Blog.


%d bloggers like this: