March 27, 2012 § 12 Comments

Not too long ago I pointed out to a young, out-of-district lawyer that the lawyer had failed to get the chancery clerk to mail a copy of the publication summons to the defendant’s last-known address and note the fact on the docket, and that I could not sign the judgment until that requirement had been met.

Later, in the clerk’s office, I was told to my chagrin that the lawyer had entered in a huff, tossed the process on the counter, and said “The judge said that y’all messed up and didn’t send the process to the defendant.” The unhappy barrister complained that about a wasted trip from [somewhere far away to the west], and demanded that the clerk send the process by certified mail immediately, and then left in a cloud of dust, no doubt headed back to the more rarified and privileged atmosphere from whence that poor soul had descended into what I am sure the lawyer considered to be our little backwater corner of legal hell.

Not to be too picky — or prickly — but I never told that lawyer that the clerk had messed up. Nor did I instruct counsel to have the process mailed by certified mail (which the poor clerk did anyway at her own expense … Rule 4 only requires regular mail). And I certainly did not suggest to the lawyer to blame it all on the clerks, or even that the clerks were to blame at all.

This unfortunate episode illustrates what that sage chancellor, Frank McKenzie of Laurel, aptly characterizes as “Contempt of clerk.” It’s conduct that I’ve described here before.

Let’s face it: the chancery clerk is in a unique position to make your job as a lawyer enjoyably easy at one extreme or excruciatingly painful at the other, with myriad shades of gray in between. You get to choose how you get treated by how you deal with the clerks.

In this particular case, when the lawyer filed the process, the lawyer should have made a simple request of the clerk to mail the process, and should have provided a copy for the clerk to do so, and should have asked the clerk (politely) to do it right then so that she could watch the entry being made on the docket. And should have done so politely.

Now, you may ask “Why should the lawyer take responsibility to do that when MRCP 4 clearly says that the clerk is the one who shall mail, etc.” Well, there are several considerations that come into play:

  • You may look high and low in the rules, and you will find no penalty for the clerk failing to mail the publication; on the other hand, you and your client pay the price if you do not see that it is done.
  • You, not the clerk, are responsible for the proper handling and processing of your case.
  • As a practical matter, how are the clerks to know that this needs to be done in a given case unless you tell them? Chancery clerks are busy handling hundreds of transactions, many of which involve minute details, and you are merely one more customer among many, many. No matter how important you think that you and your case are, every other customer feels exactly the same way.
  • The easier you make the clerk’s job, the more likely it is that it will be done to your satisfaction.

Part of making the clerk’s job easier is human relations. It doesn’t take much sense to realize that a pompous, arrogant, demanding jackass will experience a certain level of customer service, and a polite, cooperative, prepared professional will have an entirely different experience. Vinegar vs. honey.

In my opinion, there is never a reason to treat clerks in a demeaning or rude fashion. Ever. For one thing, they are in a demanding job and they are doing the best they can do. For another, they are an important arm of the courts, and they deserve the same respect from you as a professional that you show to all other court personnel.

The penalty for contempt of clerk can be drastic. Would you rather get a call the day after you mailed that complaint telling you that you had neglected to enclose a check for court costs, or would you rather find out six weeks later that your pleadings have been setting on a desk awaiting your check? I’m not saying that a clerk would be so unprofessional as to do something like that intentionally, but with scarce resources, clerks have to triage matters, and, human nature being what it is, butterflies draw more favorable attention than dung beetles.

Tagged: , ,

§ 12 Responses to CONTEMPT OF CLERK

  • Allyson says:

    We (the secretaries/assistants/paralegals) have a general rule. Do not make enemies of court clerks, court administrators or other secretaries/assistants/paralegals. The above mentioned individuals are the gate keepers to everything you need. Make an enemy of them and your job just got harder.

    • vdcster says:

      So true, Allyson. I’ve worked for attorneys since the mid-70s and I’ve made many friends in the Clerk’s offices all across North MS. I learned early on to make the Clerk and Deputy Clerk’s jobs easier, and as you said, your job gets easier. They have to take enough abuse from the public, to say nothing of being talked down to by that out-of-town lawyer who thinks they are dumb yokels, or being snapped at the Chancellor who is having a bad day & takes it out on the Clerk’s staff.

  • Your Lies Have Lies says:

    I have always been as polite as can be while in a clerk’s office. I know they have a hard job and they get little praise for doing it.

    Recently I was in a county near the Tennessee line and needed an affidavit notarized. I was close to the courthouse, so I ran in the Chancery Clerk’s office and asked them if they would notarize it for me. The clerk on duty said there was no notary in that office. When I said the clerk and the deputy clerks were all notaries by statute, they looked at me like I lost my mind. When I said the court seal should go where the notary seal would usually go, you would think I was trying to touch the Holy Grail. I didn’t get mad; I just left in astonishment and walked down the hall to the Circuit Clerk’s office, where there was no problem at all.

  • randywallace says:

    Misrepresenting a Chancellor’s statements to the Clerk……..not a good way to start the morning or a legal career.

    • Anderson says:

      You have to wonder about people who think that the judge regards the clerk’s office as menial peons who can be disparaged with impunity.

  • Matt says:

    We aren’t all like that…regardless of how young we may appear or how west our office is located.

  • Anderson says:

    One should always be polite to the clerk, of course, but offices like Hinds Circuit’s make that more of a challenge than it should be.

    And then there’s the MSSC clerk’s office, which functions on various rules known only to themselves and to the attorneys who run afoul of them.

    • Larry says:

      Your comment up there “There are two kinds of people, those who think there are two kinds of people, and those who don’t.

      (I’m the latter.)”

      Anderson, you are a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma stuffed in a wonton wrapper of conundrum.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading CONTEMPT OF CLERK at The Better Chancery Practice Blog.


%d bloggers like this: