UCCR 8.05, AMENDED
December 5, 2011 § Leave a comment
The Mississippi Supreme Court approved an amendment to the financial reporting form requirement on December 1, 2011. You can read the entire, amended rule here.
The amendment adds the following language:
The disclosures shall include any and all assets and liabilities, whether marital or non-marital. A party is under a duty to supplement prior disclosures if that party knows that the disclosure, though correct when made, no longer accurately reflects any and all actual income and expenses and assets and liabilities, as required by this Rule.
The amendment adds two significant provisions: (1) The duty to disclose both marital and non-marital financial matters; and (2) the duty to supplement.
Both of the added requirements clarify the duty of disclosure and give the courts clearcut authority when called upon to address less than candid financial reporting.
If I were practicing nowadays, I would create a handout for my clients detailing the duty of disclosure and the duty to supplement, and I would have my client sign a receipt for the handout to keep in my file. It could come in handy when the client gets burned to a charred ember for false or inadequate disclosure, and the client tries to point the finger of blame at the attorney.
I would also take great care with my 8.05’s. I would go over them with my clients to make sure they are complete and accurate.
If you still aren’t convinced of the importance of adequate, timely, up-to-date and supplemented 8.05 statements, I invite you to read yet again about the disastrous (for the non-disclosing party) case of Trim v. Trim. Fair warning, however: don’t read Trim right before bed time; it might keep you awake.
I’ve tried to stress on this blog just how crucial it is to your case to present a well-prepared financial statement. Here are some links: