Researching the Research

August 3, 2015 § 5 Comments

Commoditization of legal matters has caused small-firm practitioners to look for areas to cut costs. Lawyers have told me that they have discontinued services like Westlaw and Lexis because they are simply too expensive.

Google Scholar offers a free legal research tool. You can access it at this link. I can’t really tell you how accurate or helpful it might prove to be in the routine practice of law, because I haven’t spent much time with it. I accessed it on a test basis last week and entered “joint custody impractical” as a search term. It returned a bunch of cases, all of them, as far as I could see, on point. It did not return last week’s COA decision in Thames v. Thames, which is the latest case on that issue. Nor did it give me Mosley v. Triangle Townhouses, LLC when I searched for “real estate commission for non-licensed broker,” likewise a COA case from last week. I don’t know the delay between hand-down and reporting on Google.

An article that may help you discern the strengths and weaknesses of the Google engine can be found at this link.

The MS Bar offers access to the legal search engine Casemaker as a benefit of membership, thereby saving you additional subscription fees for that service. You may have had excellent results with it, but I never did when I was practicing, and I have heard other attorneys complain about it; conversely, I have never heard anyone extol it. Your experience may be different.

If you google “free legal research engines,” you will pull up a wealth of links to various services, and you may wish to sample them.

We judges use Westlaw, and in the past have used Lexis when it offered AOC a better deal. Both are good, and produce useful, topical research results. Here in Lauderdale County the supervisors purportedly provide Westlaw as a service to the bar and jailhouse lawyers. The only problem is that access is limited to one person hired by the Sups to do the job, so lawyers are at the mercy of a non-lawyer to do their legal research for them. That’s an entirely unsatisfactory arrangement that could invite malpractice claims, and I don’t know of a single lawyer — other than the writ-writers behind bars — who avails himself or herself of this program. It might be possible for a county to provide a monthly subscription at a terminal for lawyers who pay a set fee for X amount of time, and then are billed for any overage.

No matter what your solution, you have got to have the ability to do legal research if you care to survive any amount of time as a lawyer.

— Thanks to Attorney Marcus Evans for the links to info about Google Scholar 

 

Where Am I?

You are currently browsing entries tagged with Google Scholar at The Better Chancery Practice Blog.