TRIAL BY CHECKLIST: ADVERSE POSSESSION

July 12, 2010 § 11 Comments

A practice tip about trial factors is here.

Section 15-1-13, MCA, sets out a six-part test that must be applied to determine whether adverse possession has occurred. 

In order for possession to be adverse, it must be:

  1. Under claim of ownership.  The possessing party must have acted with respect to the land as if he or she owned it. Jordan v. Peters, 986 So.2d 1018, 1022 (Miss. App. 2008); 
  2. Actual or hostile.  Actual possession is effective control over a definite area of land, evidenced by things visible to the eye or perceptible to the senses. Blankenship v. Payton, 605 So.2d 817, 819-820 (Miss. 1992); 
  3. Open, notorious and visible.  In order for possession to be open, notorious and visible, “An adverse possessor must unfurl his flag on the land and keep it flying so that the owner may see … that an enemy has invaded his domains, and planted the standard of conquest.” Sturdivant v. Todd, 956 So.2d 977, 982 (Miss. App. 2007);
  4. Continuous and uninterrupted for a period of ten years.   Possession may be tacked on to the possession of predecessors in title. Jordan, at 1023;
  5. Exclusive.  The law requires that the person possessing the property in question must intend to possess the land over all others and to the exclusion of all others. Sturdivant, at 992; and
  6. Peaceful.  The adverse possession must be peaceful and unchallenged by the title owner. See, Sturdivant, at 987.

The claim of adverse possession must be established by clear and convincing evidence. Thornhill v. Caroline Hunt Trust Estate, 594 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Miss. 1992).

The adverse possession statute was enacted by the legislature to address the serious problems caused by landowners who ignore claims or encroachments over long periods of time. Clanton v. Hathorn, 600 So.2d 963, 966 (Miss. 1992).

There are various cases interpreting the adverse possession factors.  The cases cited here are only a basic introduction.

 

TRIAL BY CHECKLIST

July 5, 2010 § 23 Comments

Some years ago an old Chancellor complained to me that we were being reduced to “trial by checklist,” what with all the cases being handed down that spelled out factors that the trial court must address in adjudicating certain issues.  Over the years, those so-called checklists have multiplied, so that Chancellors are required to consider and address factors in determining:

  • Child custody
  • Equitable distribution
  • Periodic and rehabilitative alimony
  • Lump sum alimony
  • Grandparent visitation
  • Separate maintenance
  • Modification of child support
  • Adverse possession
  • Attorney’s fees

Over time, I will be posting these factor “checklists” for your use.

Remember that these factors are the ones that must be decided by the judge in order to decide your case.  In essence, the factors are the elements of the case that will determine its outcome.  If you are not putting on proof as to each factor that applies in your case, you are running the risk that the Chancellor will find that there is not enough evidence to rule in your favor. 

Practice Tip:  When trying a case involving any of the foregoing issues, have a list of the factors applicable your case at hand, and methodically cover them in your questions for the witnesses.  Give some thought to questions that will best develop evidence that will support a finding in your client’s favor for as many factors as possible, and how to minimize the impact of factors that are not in your favor.

Where Am I?

You are currently browsing entries tagged with Factors at The Better Chancery Practice Blog.