WHEN IS MODIFICATION OF CHILD SUPPORT EFFECTIVE?

August 23, 2010 § Leave a comment

A judgment modifying child support upward may be effective on the date that the petition is filed, or on a later date “within the sound discretion of the trial court.”  Lawrence v. Lawrence, 574 So.2d 1376, 1384 (Miss. 1991).  In Frazier v. Burnett, 767 So.2d 263, 268 (Miss. App. 2000), the court stated that the “best practice” is to make the modification retroactive to the date of filing.

A judgment modifying child support downward or terminating it may not be retroactive because each child support payment vests when and as due, and may not be forgiven.  Cumberland v. Cumberland, 564 So.2d 839, 847 (Miss. 1990).  

§ 43-19-35 (4), MCA, effective July 1, 2010, and repealed automatically July 1, 2011, includes the following curious language:

(4)  “Any order for support of minor children … shall not be subject to a downward retroactive modification.  An upward retroactive mofidication may be ordered back to the date of the event justifying the upward modification.” [Emphasis added]

What exactly is the date of the event that would justify the upward change is not defined, nor have there been any cases construing the statute.

The question arises from time to time whether the court may order retroactivity without a request therefor in the pleading.  Chancellors in my experience are split, some taking the position that it must be pled, some saying that it need not be since it is in the discretion of the trial judge.  My own position is that it is a simple Fifth Amendment due process matter.  You are trying to take someone else’s money, and because you are, you are required to put that person on notice and afford the opportunity to defend.  In my opinion, the opposing party needs to be put on notice of whatever relief you are seeking, including retroactive modification, and that without that notice, the court can not grant your client that relief.

Clearly the safest position is to include a prayer for retroactive relief in every petition to modify child support.  Get in your computers and add that language to your petition for modification of child support.

TEN TIPS FOR MORE EFFECTIVE RULE 8.05 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 16, 2010 § 16 Comments

If your case involves economic issues or property division, Rule 8.05 of the Uniform Chancery Court Rules requires that you provide a financial statement complying with the form published in the rules. 

An effective financial statement can make or break your case.  It is the template for your client’s testimony, and a poorly-prepared statement will make your client cannon fodder for cross examination, while a well-prepared one will inoculate him or her from serious damage.  Most importantly, the financial statement is what the judge will spend the most time mulling over when fashioning an opinion.  The more effective your statement, the better off your case will be. 

Here are ten ways you can make your Rule 8.05 statements more effective:

  1. Never present a financial statement that you have not gone over in detail with your client.  As part of your trial preparation, question the client’s figures, test his or her mastery of the information on it.  If your experience tells you that a figure is unreasonably high or low, question it and make the client defend it.  If the client can not defend the number, suggest that the client reconsider it.  And while you’re at it, make sure that your client knows what he or she included in every category.  Are there duplications?  For instance, if your client charges clothing for the children on her MasterCard, did she duplicate the amount paid on the card in the line for clothing?  Don’t just take your client’s figures at face value; inquire about them.  I once asked a woman on the witness stand how she came up with $480 a month for entertainment, and she explained that was the amount she had spent the month before for flowers for her aunt’s funeral, and that her sisters were going to reimburse her.  When I asked what she usually spent on entertainment, she said $50.  In one fell swoop, I lopped $430 a month off of her expenses, diminishing her alimony claim against my client.  Her attorney had simply taken her word for the $480 expenditure without questioning behind it.      
  2. Always have the statement typed so that it clearly presents your client’s position.  A handwritten statement with scratched-out figures and marks, notations and arithmetic that doesn’t add up will just add confusion and make the judge’s job disagreeably more difficult.  Take the time to type the figures in their proper places and make sure they add up properly.  Remember the old adage:  “The easier you make the judge’s job, the more likely it is you will prevail.”  Okay, that’s probably not really an old adage, but it should be.  
  3. Make sure the tax returns are attached.  Copies of the preceding year’s state and federal income tax returns “in full form as filed” are required.  This means that all schedules and w-2’s must be attached.  If a document was sent with the original return to the IRS, a copy of it must be included.
  4. Have an adequate number of copies.  “When offered in a trial or a conference, the party offering the disclosure statement shall provide a copy of the disclosure statement to the Court, the witness and opposing counsel.”  This means that, in addition to the original in evidence, you should have three additional copies, plus one for yourself.  It does your client absolutely no good for the court not to have a copy to look at while your client is being examined about it.  It would even be a good idea to provide an extra copy for the judge to mark up with his or her own notes during testimony.
  5. Include a complete employment history.  Some lawyers have deleted this from the form in their computers, for some reason, but it is specifically required in the rule:  “A general statement of the providing party describing employment history and earnings from the inception of the marriage or from the date of the divorce, whichever is applicable.”  This information is vitally important in connection with property division, alimony, child support and even child custody, and yet it is often omitted by lawyers.
  6. Be sure to explain any discrepancies.  If your client has a perfectly logical explanation why the cell phone bill is $375 a month, be sure to cover it.  If expenses exceed income, how is the client managing to pay the difference?  If your client’s year-to-date income includes a one-time bonus that will never be repeated, notate that and have your client testify about it; if you don’t explain it, you can expect that the judge will include the bonus in your client’s income.
  7. Use an up-to-date statement.  A financial statement prepared six months ago in discovery and not updated since is simply not a statement of “actual income and expenses and assets and liabilities,” as required in the rule.  It defeats the purpose of the rule for a witness to spend a couple of hours explaining how the statement should be updated when that should have been done in trial preparation.  If you come to court without an updated statement, the court may continue your trial to require you to prepare one.
  8. Have your client sign and date the statement.  The Court of Appeals has been critical of unsigned financial statements. 
  9. Make sure the entries really are what they say.  A voluntary 401(k) contribution is not “mandatory retirement,” and should not be listed on that line.  Nor is a private health insurance premium “mandatory insurance.”  The term “mandatory” as used on the form refers to items required by law, such as PERS retirement. 
  10. Remember that a month has more than four weeks.  A month is 52 weeks divided by 12, or 4.3.  A client who says “I get paid $400 every Friday, so I make $1,600 a month” is wrong; the correct amount would be $1,720.

TRIAL BY CHECKLIST: MODIFICATION OF CHILD SUPPORT

August 12, 2010 § 9 Comments

A practice tip about trial factors is here.

The trial court is required to consider the factors set out in Adams v. Adams, 467 So. 2d 211, 215 (Miss. 1985), in determining whether child support should be modified.

  1. Increased needs caused by advanced age and maturity of the children;
  2. Increase in expenses;
  3. Inflation factor;
  4. The relative financial condition and earning capacity of the parties;
  5. The physical and psychological health and special medical needs of the child;
  6. The health and special medical needs of the parents, both physical and psychological;
  7. The necessary living expenses of the paying party;
  8. The estimated amount of income taxes that the respective parties must pay on their incomes;
  9. The free use of residence, furnishings, and automobiles; and
  10. Any other factors and circumstances that bear on the support as shown by the evidence. (citing Brabham v. Brabham, 226 Miss. 165, 176, 84 So. 2d 147, 153 (1955).

Expenses of private school are a legitimate factor to consider in modification proceedings, although the expenses are inadequate standing alone. Southerland v. Southerland, 816 So. 2d 1004, 1007 (¶13) (Miss. 2002).

Educational expenses may be properly considered with the increased needs of older children and their increased extracurricular activities in order to justify an increase in child support. Havens v. Brooks, 728 So. 2d 580, 583 (¶9) (Miss. Ct. App. 1998).

Remember that the keystone consideration for modification is a change in expenses of the child.  You must put on proof that establishes what the expenses were at the time of the judgment you are seeking to modify, as well as proof of the expenses at the time of trial.  Most importantly:  It is not adequate to prove only that the income of the paying parent has increased.

NEW LEGISLATION THAT MAY AFFECT YOUR CHANCERY PRACTICE

June 25, 2010 § 6 Comments

A number of bills passed in the 2010 Regular Session of the Legislature that you may find will have some effect on your practice in Chancery Court.  Below is a bulleted list with a brief description of the pertinent portions of each bill.  You can read the full text of the bills here.  Thanks to Steve Horne, Representative in District 81 for providing me with the summaries.  I will provide more detailed summaries of some of the bills in later posts.

All laws are effective July 1, 2010, unless noted otherwise.

  • HB 277.  Statutory method for renewing a judgment.
  • HB 704.  DHS may obtain income tax and sales tax information without a subpoena for individuals who are delinquent in child support payments. 
  • HB 886.  Prohibits a deed restriction or other covenant running with the land that requires a transferee or his heirs, successors or assigns to pay a property transfer fee, and any such provision is void and unenforceable.  The prohibition does not apply to certain property owners’ associations.
  • HB 1400.  Increases from $10,000 to $20,000 the amount of money or value of property that may be transferred to a ward without a guardianship, in the discretion of the Chancellor.
  • SB 2413.  Amends § 93-5-34, MCA, to clarify custody and visitation procedures when a parent receives military orders for temporary duty, deployment or mobilization.
  • SB 2929.  Youth Court has exclusive jurisdiction over delinquent acts committed by a child until the child’s 18th birthday.  Circuit Court may assume jurisdiction when transferred to it from Youth Court.
  • SB 2800.  Remedies of lien laws available to suppliers and construction contractors are made available on the same basis to rental and lease equipment suppliers.
  • HB 1479, effective July 1, 2011.  The name of Oakley Training School is changed to Oakley Youth Development Center.
  • HB 1049 and 1525.  Makes many changes in the mental commitment law.  The changes are too numerous to list here, and they will be detailed in a subsequent post.   

ESSENTIAL INGREDIENTS FOR CHILD SUPPORT AND 8.06 PROVISIONS IN ID DIVORCES

June 15, 2010 § 2 Comments

The chancery judge in an irreconcilable differences (ID) divorce is required by law to make a determination about the sufficiency of the provision for support of the minor children.  Different chancellors approach the task in different ways.  Some judges require a complete Rule 8.05 financial statement from each party.  Some judges take the word of the attorney or litigants.

In District 12, you are required to include some specific information about income of the paying parent.  The property settlement agreement must include information showing gross income and deductions for taxes, Medicare and social security for year to date for the paying party, in the form of a pay stub attached to the agreement or a recitation of the actual figures, including monthly and year-to-date figures, in the body of the agreement; in the alternative, a statement satisfactory to the court as to why such information is not available. If the pay stub is attached, the agreement itself must include a provision that both parties have seen and are satisfied with the accuracy of the document.  If the required information is not included, the agreement will not be approved. 

As for Rule 8.06 disclosures, all current required information for both parties must be set out in the body of the agreement or in any attached visitation schedule.  So the property settlement agreement must include the current names, addresses and telephone numbers of both parents and include the standard language informing the parties of their continuing duty of disclosure.

Practice Tip:  Change your property settlement agreement forms to include the required language.   

Where Am I?

You are currently browsing the Child Support category at The Better Chancery Practice Blog.