“Quote Unquote”

April 7, 2017 § Leave a comment

“See everything; overlook a great deal; correct a little.” – Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, Pope John XXIII

“Not the power to remember, but its very opposite, the power to forget, is a necessary condition for our existence.” – Sholem Asch

“True tolerance remains mindful of the humanity of those who make things easy for themselves and welcomes and even loves honest and thoughtful opposition above less thoughtful agreement.” – Walter Kaufmann

img_7012aa

No Factors, No Affirmance

April 5, 2017 § 1 Comment

The COA’s March 21, 2017, decision in Sullivan v. Sullivan, is not going to have far-reaching impact on Mississippi law. It’s yet another in a long line of cases that reverses and remands because the chancellor’s findings did not address Ferguson and Armstrong factors. Not that big a deal, really.

Now, we don’t know much from the COA’s decision about what exactly happened in that particular case, but consider this scenario from a case in my court not long ago:

Husband’s attorney withdraws from the case, leaving him unrepresented in a case that had been pending nearly two years. When he appears for trial five months later, he asks for a continuance to get an attorney, which request is denied. The trial proceeds.

In the course of presenting proof on the issue of equitable distribution, the attorney for wife puts on proof as to only one Ferguson factor, a point I noted in my opinion, in which I nonetheless did effect an equitable distribution.

Husband timely filed a R59 motion asking for a do-over because I should have granted the continuance, which would have allowed husband to present an effective challenge to the equitable distribution.

I rejected his argument that I should have given him more time to get an attorney.

But … I felt that I had no choice but to grant the re-do as to the equitable distribution simply due to the paucity of the record as to any proof to support the Ferguson analysis. I am confident that, if I had rejected his argument and he appealed, the COA would have sent the case back for a more substantial record. So the husband will have assistance of counsel when the issue comes ’round again.

This could have been avoided had counsel for wife taken a little more time to get evidence into the record of as many of the Ferguson factors as applied.

Getting back to Sullivan, sometimes when I read these cases I wonder whether the fault was the chancellor’s or whether the fault lay in the cards that the judge was dealt.

April 3, 2017 § 2 Comments


Globetrotting for the next little while, so posts will be somewhat sparse.

I’ll have little-to-no internet access, so moderation of comments will be little-to-none.

Where Am I?

You are currently viewing the archives for April, 2017 at The Better Chancery Practice Blog.