‘NUF SAID

December 14, 2011 § 1 Comment

Following is the entire opinion rendered in the case of Denny v. Radar Industries Inc., 28 Mich. App. 294, 184 N.W.2d 289 (1970):

“The appellant has attempted to distinguish the factual situation in this case from that in Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating and Manufacturing Co., Inc. (1969), 17 Mich.App. 259, 169 N.W.2d 326. He didn’t. We couldn’t. Affirmed. Costs to appellee.”

Michigan Court of Appeals Judge J. H. Gillis deserves a medal for getting right to the point.

Tagged:

§ One Response to ‘NUF SAID

Leave a comment

What’s this?

You are currently reading ‘NUF SAID at The Better Chancery Practice Blog.

meta